claim any to contribute you excess
and what the fuck is with a legal academic using quantum theory to explain the law? i thought i was the only one stupid enough to do that.
(to paraphrase): positive and normative views of the law can coexist but not be one coherent theory. like how an electron can be a wave and a particle, but not at the same time.
bite me. mr wibren van der burg.
(and yes, i took have fall into that trap. using emergent system theory to explain scalar sociopolitics but at least i had the good sense to point out the inherent psuedoscience of applying physics to sociology. chomsky would be proud -- appropriation of language to product false authority.)
(to paraphrase): positive and normative views of the law can coexist but not be one coherent theory. like how an electron can be a wave and a particle, but not at the same time.
bite me. mr wibren van der burg.
(and yes, i took have fall into that trap. using emergent system theory to explain scalar sociopolitics but at least i had the good sense to point out the inherent psuedoscience of applying physics to sociology. chomsky would be proud -- appropriation of language to product false authority.)
posted by stu willis at
9:05 pm
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home